Buy Steroids Forum  

Go Back   Buy Steroids Forum > Steroid > Archived Greats

IGF-1 and Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy

Archived Greats Discuss IGF-1 and Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy in the Steroid forums; IGF-1 and Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy by Bryan Haycock Bryan is founder of Hypertrophy-Specific Nutrition. a dietary and sports supplement company ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-2007, 09:38 AM
Action
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default IGF-1 and Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy

IGF-1 and Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy
by Bryan Haycock


Bryan is founder of Hypertrophy-Specific Nutrition. a dietary and sports supplement company dedicated to creating and bringing to market new and innovative nutritional products. These products (e.g. Driver Protein and Primer Protein) are designed and formulated specifically for competitive athletes, and serve as a high-end option for the casual health and fitness enthusiast.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Localized infusion of IGF-I results in skeletal muscle hypertrophy in rats.

Researchers: Gregory R. Adams & Samuel A. McCue
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Ca.
Source: Journal of Applied Physiology 84(5): 1716-1722, 1998

Summary: The present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that direct IGF-I infusion would result in an increase in muscle DNA as well as in various measurements of muscle size. Either 0.9% saline or nonsystemic doses of recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-1) were infused directly into a non-weight-bearing muscle of rats, the tibialis anterior (TA), via a fenestrated catheter attached to a subcutaneous miniosmotic pump. Saline infusion had no effect on the mass, protein content, or DNA content of TA muscles. Local IGF-I infusion had no effect on body or heart weight. The absolute weight of the infused TA muscles was ~9% greater (P < 0.05) than that of the contra-lateral TA muscles. IGF-I infusion resulted in significant increases in the total protein and DNA content of TA muscles (P < 0.05). As a result of these coordinated changes, the DNA-to-protein ratio of the hypertrophied TA was similar to that of the contra-lateral muscles. These results suggest that IGF-I may be acting to directly stimulate processes such as protein synthesis and satellite cell proliferation, which result in skeletal muscle hypertrophy.

Discussion: The details of the mechanisms and pathways by which mechanical stress stimulates localized muscle fiber hypertrophy are still being elucidated. It is clear however, that growth hormone (GH), fibroblast growth factors (FGF) and insulin-like growth factors (IGF) play a central role in this process. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) peptide levels have been shown to increase in overloaded skeletal muscles (G. R. Adams and F. Haddad. J. Appl. Physiol. 81: 2509-2516, 1996). In that study, there was an increase in IGF-1 content before measurable increases in muscle protein and was correlated with an increase in muscle DNA content. Several other studies have shown that muscle fibers undergoing hypertrophy, due to mechanical stress, express elevated levels of IGF-I prior to hypertrophy.

IGF-1 appears to be an important regulator of the nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio. Studies have show that a muscle will only undergo hypertrophy if it can maintain the ratio of the cell’s volume to the number of nuclei within a finite limit. In the study above, a relatively "unloaded" muscle, the anterior tibialis, was injection with 0.9 - 1.9 micrograms/kg/day of rhIGF-1 which then mimicked the effects of physically loading the muscle. There was an increase in protein content, cross sectional area and DNA content. The increase in muscle DNA is presumed to be a result of increased proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells which donate their nuclei upon fusion with damaged or hypertrophying muscle cells. Take note that the quantities of IGF-1 used in the injections were extremely small, much smaller than studies that have shown relatively poor results from administering IGF-1 systemically which range from 1.0 to 6.9 milligrams/kg/day.

All of the attention and discussion of half-hazzardly injecting fat into muscles to increase the girth of a limb is only a symptom of the obsessive nature of bodybuilding. I would imagine that locally injecting minute amounts (micrograms) of rhIGF-1 to actually increase the growth of individual muscles would be a far better alternative to injecting fat, Esiclene or even getting silicone implants. Those bodybuilders at the national or professional level with lagging calves would be wise to consider the results of this study should they stumble across a bottle of Genentech’s rhIGF-1!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2007, 03:10 PM
tom123
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

good read im starting the igf next week...........
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.